Jenny McCarthy – A Wasted Effort
Date: March 9, 2008 | Author: Steven NovellaCategory: Science and Medicine | Comments: 15 » |
Ed Warren dedicated the better part of his life to investigating (sort of) ghosts and “educating” the public about ghostly phenomena. If science and reason are any judge, ghosts do not exist. They are a figment of human fear, superstition, and imagination. Therefore, one might argue that Ed Warren wasted his entire career on a fiction. He’s not the only one.
I often ponder those individuals who waste years or even decades following a lost cause, an intellectual dead end. By that I don’t mean scientists throughout history who were wrong in their conclusions – being wrong is of great scientific value. Rather I refer to those who are not even wrong, whose efforts yield no progress, no insights, nothing except perhaps a cautionary tale about pursuing figments. It’s sad. What’s worse is that human psychology is such that most individuals, after a certain investment of effort and prestige, are incapable of admitting their error and thereby cutting their losses. If anything, the more the evidence suggests they are on the wrong track the more desperate they become to prove they are correct.
Actress Jenny McCarthy has set herself on such a path. She has a son with autism. My sympathies go to any parent with an afflicted child, but such sympathy does not excuse taking it upon oneself to cause harm through ignorance. McCarthy has chosen to leverage her modest fame to champion the disproved notion that there is a link between vaccines and autism.
Her crusade began with a book: Louder Than Words: A Mother’s Journey in Healing Autism. This, of course, led her to the book lecture circuit, including an appearance on Oprah. Her primary point in the book is that her “mommy instinct” is a more reliable indicator of scientific truth than science. If we don’t believe her than we are attacking mommies.
More recently she has been claiming that diet along can ease the symptoms of autism. Starpulse Entertainment News Blog reports that:
Actress/model Jenny McCarthy has called on the U.S. medical community to recognize that diet and vitamins can help ease the symptoms of autism.
I have no problem with celebrities or politicians using their position to raise awareness, or even to advocate for more research into a particular problem. But I do have a problem with a celebrity with no scientific credentials calling on the medical community to accept a particular scientific claim – in this case that diet can help autism. She is quoted as saying:
I’ve been speaking to moms across the country who are all shouting out the same thing: ‘This (diet and supplement intake) is working.’ It’s so heartbreaking to see the medical community not support something called diet and vitamins.
It may surprise McCarthy to learn that medical scientists actually do something called research and they are quite capable of reading the scientific literature and coming to their own conclusions. They don’t need a second-rate celebrity to tell them how to interpret the scientific evidence. She is also arguing for the acceptance of anecdotal evidence. This is simply naive – scientists understand why anecdotes are not reliable. So McCarthy is also telling scientists to abandon the scientific methods they have developed over the past few centuries. Without any scientific background she feels she can tell scientists how to do their job. I would never presume to tell an actress how to do her job, or to make naive judgments that call into question the thespian arts as they have developed over centuries.
Now McCarthy is trying to organize a protest rally outside the Center for Disease Control (CDC). This completes her journey to full-fledged pseudoscientific activist. She can now join the ranks of all those who wish to overturn scientific knowledge by grass-roots fiat, rather than by, you know, scientific evidence. She is no different than creationists who use political means to attack evolution, or Neal Adams who uses his minor fame to promote his hollow earth nonsense. Actually McCarthy is arguably worse, for she is meddling in medical science, and her shenanigans can cause direct harm to the public.
I will counter Jenny McCarthy’s call to action with one of my own. I call upon all those autism activists out there (McCarthy included) who wish to help children with autism and who profess to want to discover true causes and treatments for autism, but who have chosen to attack the scientific community with accusations of conspiracy, to abandon their current counterproductive activities. Stop attacking science and scientists. Stop advocating for anecdotes over evidence. Stop the baseless accusations of widespread conspiracies among medical professionals. This is not only a wasted effort, it is counterproductive. You are causing harm to the very people you profess to want to help.
Instead, decide to work with the scientific medical community. Help scientists do their job by raising awareness and funds, but don’t tell them how to do their job. If you think an avenue of investigation is being neglected then work through the scientific community to make your argument. Science works because ideas must survive on their own merits – don’t subvert this system because you think you have some magical access to the truth. You don’t. Strive to make your organization and your efforts as science-based as possible – otherwise you are nothing but an ideological cult. Stop wasting all your energy and effort.
I am not optimistic that Jenny McCarthy or any of the other misguided autism activists will see the light. They are likely too far down the rabbit hole to turn back now, and there are huge psychological barriers to making such a profound change in outlook.
Perhaps trying to reason with the unreasonable is my wasted effort.
15 Responses to “Jenny McCarthy – A Wasted Effort”
By PD on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Steve
You must be just as delighted as the rest of us to read the following NYT article about a decision from the a federal compensation court regarding an autism “reaction”: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/08/us/08vaccine.html?ex=1362718800&en=f8a317e58a226596&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
This decision should give the Jenny McCarthys and Oprahs of the world renewed energy in their pseudoscientific movement to connect autism with childhood vaccinations. Wow. Critical thinking, where art thou?
By PD on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Me again. Sorry about the lengthy link, but I have no idea how to post it any differently. If someone can fix it, please do.
By SimonS on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
PD
Can I recommend http://tinyurl.com/?
It will sort out all your lengthy link worries.
By wb4 on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
PD, regarding posting long links, have a look at tinyurl.com.
By Steven Novella on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Regarding the government decision – I write about it here: http://www.theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php?p=203
By Muero on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
“If we don’t believe her than we are attacking mommies.”
Should be “If we don’t believe her, then we are attacking mommies.”
By godkillzyou on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
As a parent, I suppose I can (sort of) see where she is coming from. As a skeptic, I can’t.
She feels desperate, looking for anything that can cure her child – wanting her problem to just go away. But, there is a huge tendency for people who aren’t scientifically educated, who don’t have strong critical thinking skills, to assume that they understand everything that goes on in the scientific world. “There isn’t a cure because scientists aren’t looking/working hard enough.”
I think, in that feeling of desperation, she thinks she’s going to take up finding a cure on her own. That somehow she’s going to find the cure for autism by “working harder.” Not through knowledge and research, but through emotion and motivation.
It is ridiculous for her to think that she seems to know where the cure lies, but scientists all over the world seemed to have missed it… or, speaking conspiratorially, they are hiding it.
At the same time, being a parent, it must be so hard to almost have to let go and truly believe that someone else is looking to do what they can to help with your situation. People (scientists) who operate and work in ways that she is totally unfamiliar with (scientifically). It can breed distrust in those who don’t understand science… like creationists who believe that science is “just another way of thinking.” That the truth is somehow subjective.
I remember when Bill O’Reilly interviewed Richard Dawkins and Bill stated that Jesus and the Judeo-Christian philosophy was his “personal truth.” A little off topic, but it speaks to the basic mindset of these people. There is only one truth. It’s not subjective, as they seem to think.
By PD on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Thanks for the tips SimonS and wb4. Me won’t be so dumb no more (I hope). And Steve, thanks for your link. As usual, you provide the rational perspective.
By doc_c on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
The SGU from this week subtly revealed that Steven is a Barack Obama supporter. I applaud your efforts to TRY to be politically unbiased.
By doc_c on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Oh and tell your buddies that insect behavior, including learning and memory, is a huge field of scientific research. The larval CNS persists into the pupal stage to form the brain, unlike other tissues.
By Kerry Maxwell on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Instead of Celebrity Rehab, how about a show where a cast of misguided and delusional celebrities have to spend [i]x[/i] amount of time living with *team rational*?
By medicated on Mar 9, 2008 | Reply
Speaking as an autistic individual, it really bothers me that the ravings of a second rate actress and model are taken as having some sort of value in a scientific discussion. Had she devoted her energies to claiming that general relativity was wrong, nobody would take any notice, and she would be ignored as the crackpot that she is. Sadly, she has latched onto autism, and so her voice will carry weight in the media.
I feel very sorry for her son. I predict that he is going to be subjected to a series of faddish ‘cures’ over the next 10 years, as his mother eventually figures out that the previous ‘cure’ didn’t work all that well.
By dcardani on Mar 10, 2008 | Reply
You need to fight fire with fire. Isn’t there some sensible celebrity with an autistic child who can speak out against the Jenny McCarthy’s of the world? I know John Travolta is out, as I’ve heard he won’t even admit his son is autistic thanks to Scientology. (See http://www.hollywoodinterrupted.com/archives/a_plea_from_hollywood_john_travolta_open_your_heart.phtml for an article about that.) Is there anyone we could send a letter to and suggest that they take up the cause? According to that link, Sylvester Stallone (ugh!), Doug Flutie and Dan Marino have autistic children and have spoken about it publicly. Any chance one of them would go on a show like Oprah and point out Ms. McCarthy’s nonsense? (Or are they crackpots about it, too?)
By wastrel on Mar 10, 2008 | Reply
“I would never presume to tell an actress how to do her job, or to make naive judgments that call into question the thespian arts as they have developed over centuries.”
The idea that the former booger swilling co-host of “Singled Out” is a practitioner of any thespian arts makes me laugh.