Episode #1072

News Items

        What's the Word

        Culture

        Questions and Emails

        Are the studies and grave predictions of global warming falsifiable? There must be other ways to falsify, other than wait for a hundred years or so and measure the changes? I have believed that there was a global warming period within the cycle of ice ages since I was in the first grade in 1966, and we were told that the glaciers were melting. We also learned in the ’60s that the cycle of ice ages are roughly 10,000 or 20000 years frequency. I question, if that cycle is already happening, what part does the age of industrialism play in global warming? How would the theory of man-made global warming, or the studies of the subject and the resulting predictions be falsifiable? I don’t claim that there is no global warming. Nor do I claim that the industrial age does not contribute. But how would we know whether the predictions in sea level rise, glaciers and ice sheets melting, etc. and everything else are accurate? Whether or not it is manmade? Especially, if it is as grave as it seems to be? How would that be falsifiable? Perhaps what I’m really asking is, how do you find all of the studies that have dealt responsibly with all of the data and calculations. How would I know if I’m looking at a good study or a bad study? And more importantly, how would such a study be falsifiable? I haven’t seen a sea level change in southern California ever in 60 years. That’s why I picked a hundred or so years to wait and measure. Same thing in Boston as far as I know. UK? Iberian peninsula? The Mediterranean seems to show great changes in sea level, but long long ago. Read any part of this that you please on the show Loving the show since the beginning! Vance in Santa Clarita, California

        Science or Fiction

        Skeptical Quote of the Week.

        ‘Success in creating effective AI, could be the biggest event in the history of our civilization. Or the worst. We just don’t know. So, we cannot know if we will be infinitely helped by AI, or ignored by it and side-lined, or conceivably destroyed by it.” Stephen Hawking